Tel: 0203 319 3643

Fax: 0208 894 5300

info@mtuk.law

Emergency: 0750 625 5550

Home after 8pm: Covid-19 court hours affecting work-life balance

By Monidipa Fouzder  >>

Legal professionals have complained about the negative effect that Covid-19 operating hours has had on their wellbeing in data published by HM Courts & Tribunals Service, which is consulting on whether to extend the controversial model to more courts next year. Respondents have only until next week to contribute.

HMCTS has been piloting Covid-19 operating hours (COH) in seven Crown court centres as part of a coronavirus recovery plan.

Assessment findings published on Friday show that COH courtrooms were disposing an average 3.5 trials per courtroom per week; the figure for courts operating standard hours was 0.9 cases per week. COH sessions were more likely than standard hours sessions to experience start time delays and this was marginally more likely to occur in the afternoon session. However, COH sessions were less likely than standard hours sessions to run beyond their listed end time.

Court staff, judges and legal professionals who worked the afternoon session reported arriving home later in the evening, which affected their work-life balance.

One legal professional said: ‘By the end of the two weeks I was exhausted. I wasn’t getting home until gone 8pm. I can’t help with childcare [because of working the PM court] and my child is in bed when I get home.’

A judge said the afternoon court was not equal to the morning court. ‘Nobody wants to be there. The energy is negative, people are very flat and tired,’ they added.

However, according to the assessment findings, some legal professionals welcomed COH as an increased opportunity to earn fees given work had reduced during the pandemic.

Should HMCTS widen the use of Covid-19 operating hours, it says the model would be a temporary measure. The first trials would take place in January and its continued operation would be reviewed in April.

HMCTS is seeking views on five questions:

  • How do you think we could improve the proposed COH model?
  • What features of the COH model work well and should be strengthened?
  • What would we need to consider in the transition and roll out of COH?
  • Are there other user groups in the criminal justice system that we should consider, and why?

The consultation closes on 10 December.

(Courtesy: The Law Society Gazette)