Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Email

info@mtuk.law

Call Us

0203 319 3643

Emergency No:

0750 625 5550

Location

52 Hounslow Road, Twickenham, Middlesex. TW2 7EX.
(Next To: International Rugby Stadium)

Jackson backs new clinical negligence liability test to allow more claims

By John Hyde >>

(17 May 2019)

Former Court of Appeal judge Sir Rupert Jackson – whose ideas have so often formed the basis of government policy – has proposed a radical change in liability and damages for clinical negligence claims.

Speaking at a medico-legal conference in London today, Jackson argued the case for a new test for liability, which would ask whether the patient had suffered ‘reasonably avoidable injury’.

Jackson: clinical negligence claims should be heard in a tribunal rather than court

Jackson accepted his proposal was likely to increase the number of claims brought for clinical negligence, but said this would be offset by plans to reduce legal costs with a tariff-based system of damages.

While the government has begun consulting on Jackson’s previous recommendations on fixed costs for lower-value claims, it remains to be seen whether a re-drawing of clinical negligence law would also find favour.

Jackson described a ‘looming problem’ where the population gets older and demands of the health service increase, with doctors relying on systematic issues and saying ‘I was doing my best in an impossible situation’.

‘The time may come, for example in an unusually long and cold winter, when an NHS trust can demonstrate it simply did not have the funds to deply the requisite staff,’ said the retired judge, who continues to work as an arbitrator and adjudicator. ‘The answer is to simplify and objectify the test for liability… if the injury was reasonably avoidable, then the fact that the doctor had been on a twelve-hour shift and had numerous other patients to treat is neither here nor there. The relevant health trust or private hospital is liable.’

Jackson said the new liability test would offer patient protection and ensure the doctor or nurse involved was not named in proceedings.

He accepted there could be more claims, but said compensation could be on fixed levels, enabling an equal distribution of the available funds amongst all deserving claimants, in place of the present system in which a small proportion of deserving claimants recover higher damages.

The costs of litigating, he suggested, could be reduced if clinical disputes were heard through a tribunal process rather than the court. A new clinical chamber of the first tier tribunal and upper tribunal could handle clinical negligence claims, as well as disciplinary matters, and would feature judges sitting alongside colleagues with medical experience.

(Courtesy: Law Society Gazette)

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
YOUR LEGAL ADVISORS
Get In Touch

Whether you need expert advice, assistance with a specific case, or ongoing legal support, our dedicated team is ready to guide you through the process.