Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Email

info@mtuk.law

Call Us

0203 319 3643

Emergency No:

0750 625 5550

Location

52 Hounslow Road, Twickenham, Middlesex. TW2 7EX.
(Next To: International Rugby Stadium)

‘Immovables rule’ has not moved, Supreme Court rules

By Michael Cross >>

(20 November 2024)

The long established principle that questions of rights to and interests in land and real estate are subject to the law of the country where the property is situated has been upheld by the Supreme Court. In Kireeva v Bedzhamov, five justices, led by Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Richards, agreed with the High Court and Court of Appeal that an English court had no jurisdiction to recognise a Russian bankruptcy order.  

The case concerns a property in Belgravia, London, owned by a Russian resident in the UK, Georgy Bedzhamov, who was declared bankrupt by a Moscow court in 2018. In 2021, Badzhamov’s bankruptcy trustee, Lyubov Kireeva, applied to the High Court for recognition of the bankruptcy order at common law and for entrustment to her of the London property. When the court refused the application, the parties went to the Court of Appeal which, in a split decision, upheld the decision. 

Kireeva appealed to the Supreme Court on the basis that the court has a common law power to recognise and grant assistance to foreign insolvency proceedings so far as it properly can. Counsel for Bedzhamov argued that, although statutory exceptions to the immoveables rule had been established by parliament, including through the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations and s426 Insolvency Act 1986, the court had no jurisdiction to assist the Russian trustee-in-bankruptcy.

The justices agreed that the exceptions to the immoveables law could not be applied ‘by analogy’, and declined to expand the common law to permit the appointment of a receiver on behalf of the Russian trustee. Any further exceptions to the immovables rule would be a matter for parliament, not the courts. 

A spokesperson for international firm Greenberg Traurig, which acted for Bedzhamov, said: ‘This is a great result for our client that shows due regard to territorial sovereignty and appropriate deference to the limits of the court’s sphere of decision-making (as opposed to parliament). Practically, it serves to limit the influence of Russian courts in respect of English land, as is appropriate for all the historical and present-day reasons set out by the court in its judgment.’

(Courtesy: The Law Scoiety Gazette)

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
YOUR LEGAL ADVISORS
Get In Touch

Whether you need expert advice, assistance with a specific case, or ongoing legal support, our dedicated team is ready to guide you through the process.